Skip to content
Stella
A Shop on Amazon β†’

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Stella McCartney

Stella

2003
USER RATINGS 4,715
Love
2,215
Like
1,891
Ok
125
Dislike
469
Hate
15
4.23 β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.23 / 5 from 4,715 votes Reviews (8)
MY COLLECTION
My votes Tracking Perfumes

Perfume Pyramid

Top Notes
β€”
Heart Notes
Base Notes
β€”

Longevity

Very weak
85
Weak
182
Moderate
567
Long lasting
315
Eternal
104

Sillage

Intimate
239
Moderate
719
Strong
299
Enormous
190

When To Wear

Pros & Cons

πŸ‘ Pros

πŸ‘Ž Cons

Reviews

  1. R
    Remy Bianchi Love April 8, 2026

    For a 2003 release, Stella deserves more attention than it gets. The heart is the best part for me: Rose and Peony feel carefully balanced. Give it a little time and Rose with Peony comes forward β€” smooth and well done. After a few hours it becomes a soft skin scent with a lovely trail. Full-bottle worthy without a doubt.

  2. C
    Caspian Hale Like June 20, 2026

    Stella McCartney knows how to compose, and Stella (2003) is proof. After about twenty minutes the heart settles into Rose with Peony, which is where the fragrance really shines. Give it a little time and Rose with Peony comes forward β€” smooth and well done. After a few hours it becomes a soft skin scent with a lovely trail. A solid addition for anyone who enjoys this style.

  3. J
    Jonas Schmidt Like July 13, 2026

    I needed a full wearing before I made my mind up about Stella. Give it a little time and Rose with Peony comes forward β€” smooth and well done. The heart is the best part for me: Rose and Peony feel carefully balanced. It performs better in warmer weather β€” in the heat it opens up nicely. A very likeable composition that is easy to appreciate.

  4. J
    Jude Santos Ok July 19, 2026

    I have owned Stella for a while now and my opinion has only gotten stronger. After about twenty minutes the heart settles into Rose with Peony, which is where the fragrance really shines. Give it a little time and Rose with Peony comes forward β€” smooth and well done. The drydown lingers pleasantly, and I do not need to reapply at lunch. I enjoy it when I wear it, yet I rarely think of reaching for it.

  5. A
    Amir Whitmore Like July 27, 2026

    I’ve been wearing Stella on and off for a few weeks now (2003). After about twenty minutes the heart settles into Rose with Peony, which is where the fragrance really shines. The heart is the best part for me: Rose and Peony feel carefully balanced. Performance is consistent: comfortable sillage and several hours of wear on my skin. A very likeable composition that is easy to appreciate.

  6. E
    Enzo Reed Like July 28, 2026

    Picked up a sample of Stella after reading the community buzz (2003). The heart is the best part for me: Rose and Peony feel carefully balanced. After about twenty minutes the heart settles into Rose with Peony, which is where the fragrance really shines. After a few hours it becomes a soft skin scent with a lovely trail. Well done β€” recommended if the notes appeal to you.

  7. A
    Amir Moreau Like August 10, 2026

    A decant of Stella sat in my box for weeks before I finally wore it. After about twenty minutes the heart settles into Rose with Peony, which is where the fragrance really shines. Give it a little time and Rose with Peony comes forward β€” smooth and well done. It performs better in warmer weather β€” in the heat it opens up nicely. I can see this getting a lot of wear in my collection.

  8. N
    Nico Silva Like August 15, 2026

    My first Stella McCartney experience was this one, Stella (2003). After about twenty minutes the heart settles into Rose with Peony, which is where the fragrance really shines. The heart is the best part for me: Rose and Peony feel carefully balanced. It projects politely for a couple of hours, then stays close and cosy. Well done β€” recommended if the notes appeal to you.

Write your review

What are you wearing today?

Your private note

Up to 255 characters. Only you can see it.

0/255

Customize charts

Choose a chart theme: